Explanation on the video below.

I've been asked what I think of the Bailouts by 3 different people today.
Okay, okay, I know Ron Paul is NOT a presidential candidate. But he definitely has educational value. (And the solution to all of these problems is for the public to somehow gain a real education in these issues and then be able to use their vote to make appropriate changes.) And since I can't make my own response sound coherent, I have to use this video! Ron Paul still seems to be the only person with an actual knowledge of economic issues, economic history, economic bailout implications etc... out of the bunch of them. (Real candidates). If people don't think he has a clue, it's generally because they don't understand it as well as he does, and don't bother to find out what he's talking about. (just an observation). He recognizes government regulation/federal corporate takeovers and bailouts (price fixing) as the socialism trend that it is. (Call it socialism, fascism, globalism or whatever, it is still centralization of federal power that results in less freedom--increased debt burden--for the people).

I am happy to see McCain/Palin's criticism of the bailout plan. I am suspicious, though, of their vague alternative solutions. It seems that if they individually don't have economic knowledge of the problems, (which they have both shown through interviews and commentary) they would be very easily led down a wrong path by "experts" without even knowing it.